June 9, 2012 by
for
1
One of the most voiced criticisms we hear of multi-core mobile processors, in addition to “why do you even need that much processing power on a smartphone, anyway,” is that all the cores in the world aren’t going to do much for performance when software isn’t taking full advantage of them. Related article: Android mini computer selling for just US$74.
Intel, a relative newbie to the Android scene with its first-such phones out this year, has recently been speaking out along those lines, accusing Android of not doing a very good job at efficiently making use of multi-core processors, and fingering SoC manufacturers as the ones who should be making the effort to make things work better.
According to Intel, Android’s thread scheduler just isn’t up to the task of getting the best performance out of the new quad-core (and to a lesser extent, dual-core) chips we’re seeing, read here: here.Since the manufacturers of those components should be the ones capable of getting the highest performance out of them, Intel thinks the companies behind these chips should be the ones contributing the necessary improvements to the Android source tree, but “they just haven’t bothered to do it.”
Sure, some of this might just be a backhanded way for Intel to congratulate itself on its own work at improving thread performance, but we agree that someone needs to be taking a closer look at Android multi-core support (Wordpress Softaculous).According to the company, some of the phones from other manufacturers end up performing worse when multiple cores are enabled Info on this site.It doesn’t name names, but if that’s true at all, it seems like a damning assessment of Android’s current relationship with multi-core chips.
Source: The Inquirer
Via: Android Guys
This article originally published at Pocketnow here.
Follow Pocketnow
Pocketnow is a Mashable publishing partner that offers a resource for smartphone reviews, news and video Find more info on this page. This article is reprinted with the publisher's permission.
